<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>depósito &#8211; DPL News</title>
	<atom:link href="https://dplnews.com/tag/deposito/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://dplnews.com</link>
	<description>DPL News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2022 15:05:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>es</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.2</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">201771233</site>	<item>
		<title>Brasil &#124; Oi Móvel: STJ nega suspensão do depósito de R$ 1,5 bi da Claro, TIM e Vivo</title>
		<link>https://dplnews.com/brasil-oi-movel-stj-nega-suspensao-do-deposito-de-r-15-bi-da-claro-tim-e-vivo/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DPL News]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2022 15:05:18 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Sin categoría]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brasil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[depósito]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oi Móvel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[STJ]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dplnews.com/?p=170414</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<div style="margin-bottom:20px;"><img width="1920" height="1080" src="https://dplnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Dplnews_reales-brasilenos_as310820.jpg" class="attachment-post-thumbnail size-post-thumbnail wp-post-image" alt="Dplnews reales brasilenos as310820" decoding="async" fetchpriority="high" srcset="https://dplnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Dplnews_reales-brasilenos_as310820.jpg 1920w, https://dplnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Dplnews_reales-brasilenos_as310820-300x169.jpg 300w, https://dplnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Dplnews_reales-brasilenos_as310820-1024x576.jpg 1024w, https://dplnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Dplnews_reales-brasilenos_as310820-768x432.jpg 768w, https://dplnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Dplnews_reales-brasilenos_as310820-1536x864.jpg 1536w, https://dplnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Dplnews_reales-brasilenos_as310820-696x392.jpg 696w, https://dplnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Dplnews_reales-brasilenos_as310820-1068x601.jpg 1068w, https://dplnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Dplnews_reales-brasilenos_as310820-747x420.jpg 747w" sizes="(max-width: 1920px) 100vw, 1920px" title="Brasil | Oi Móvel: STJ nega suspensão do depósito de R$ 1,5 bi da Claro, TIM e Vivo 1"></div>Teletime – Bruno do Amaral A ministra presidente do Superior Tribunal de Justiça, Maria Thereza de Assis Moura,&#160;rejeitou&#160;um pedido da Claro, TIM e Vivo de suspensão de liminar, com tutela de urgência, para evitar o depósito judicial de R$ 1,527 bilhão para a Oi na&#160;disputa pelo reajuste do preço da venda da Oi Móvel. A [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="margin-bottom:20px;"><img width="1920" height="1080" src="https://dplnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Dplnews_reales-brasilenos_as310820.jpg" class="attachment-post-thumbnail size-post-thumbnail wp-post-image" alt="Dplnews reales brasilenos as310820" decoding="async" srcset="https://dplnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Dplnews_reales-brasilenos_as310820.jpg 1920w, https://dplnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Dplnews_reales-brasilenos_as310820-300x169.jpg 300w, https://dplnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Dplnews_reales-brasilenos_as310820-1024x576.jpg 1024w, https://dplnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Dplnews_reales-brasilenos_as310820-768x432.jpg 768w, https://dplnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Dplnews_reales-brasilenos_as310820-1536x864.jpg 1536w, https://dplnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Dplnews_reales-brasilenos_as310820-696x392.jpg 696w, https://dplnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Dplnews_reales-brasilenos_as310820-1068x601.jpg 1068w, https://dplnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Dplnews_reales-brasilenos_as310820-747x420.jpg 747w" sizes="(max-width: 1920px) 100vw, 1920px" title="Brasil | Oi Móvel: STJ nega suspensão do depósito de R$ 1,5 bi da Claro, TIM e Vivo 2"></div>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Teletime – Bruno do Amaral</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A ministra presidente do Superior Tribunal de Justiça, Maria Thereza de Assis Moura,&nbsp;<strong>rejeitou</strong>&nbsp;um pedido da Claro, TIM e Vivo de suspensão de liminar, com tutela de urgência, para evitar o depósito judicial de R$ 1,527 bilhão para a Oi na&nbsp;<a href="https://teletime.com.br/19/09/2022/tim-vivo-e-claro-detalham-discordancias-para-justificar-indenizacao-com-a-oi-movel/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">disputa pelo reajuste do preço da venda da Oi Móvel</a>. A decisão foi assinada na segunda-feira, 17, mas&nbsp;<a href="https://processo.stj.jus.br/processo/dj/documento/mediado/?seq_publicacao=16642&amp;seq_documento=34263544&amp;data_pesquisa=20/10/2022&amp;versao=impressao&amp;nu_seguimento=00001&amp;tipo_documento=documento&amp;ids=34263397,34263886,34263868,34263429,34265916,34265871,34265584,34263901,34265880,34265883,34265920,34265904,34263880,34263925,34265922,34265907,34265927,34265895,34265910,34265900,34263913,34265913,34263425,34263865,34263399,34263389,34263394,34263395,34263386,34263403,34263565,34263801,34263809,34263582,34263414,34263585,34263814,34265889,34263419,34263422,34263789,34263588,34263781,34267296,34265706,34263544,34267297,34267298,34267299,34252954" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">publicada</a>&nbsp;nesta quinta-feira, 20.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As teles argumentavam que a suspensão da ordem judicial da 7ª Vara Empresarial do Tribunal de Justiça do Rio de Janeiro era de interesse público, uma vez que o pagamento da quantia traria riscos à prestação dos serviços.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">No entanto, a ministra não entendeu desta forma, dizendo que haveria apenas &#8220;suposições e assertivas&#8221; de consequência danosa para as operadoras, mas &#8220;nada, porém, se tem de concreto&#8221;. Para ela, embora o valor do depósito seja elevado,&nbsp;<strong>comparado ao montante do lucro e dividendos no ano em curso, &#8220;não representa risco às atividades</strong>&#8220;.&nbsp;</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Leia mais: <a href="https://teletime.com.br/20/10/2022/oi-movel-stj-nega-suspensao-do-deposito-de-r-15-bi-da-claro-tim-e-vivo/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">https://teletime.com.br/20/10/2022/oi-movel-stj-nega-suspensao-do-deposito-de-r-15-bi-da-claro-tim-e-vivo/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">170414</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
